NIIT tech
I have written on NIIT earlier (see here).

NIIT recently announced the Q4 09 results and published the transcript of their investor call. Some thoughts on the call

– Topline grew by 10% (excluding hedging losses), and operating margins increased to 22.3% from 19% (excluding hedging losses) for the quarter.
– The topline growth was around 5% for the year and the operating margins held steady. However the bottom line dropped by more than 10% due to the hedging losses.
– Hedging losses were around 22 Crs. This is the most ridicolous hedge I have ever seen. They had created a hedge for almost 2+ years of revenue at the rate of almost 41.6 Rs. I cannot understand why the management would have taken such a long hedge last year and assume that the currency would only strengthen.
– The company now has a hedge of around 1 year at the same rate and has mark to market loss of 199 Crs. The underlying earning power of the company is not impacted by this hedge, but some finance guys probably the CFO should be taken to task for such a hedge. The above losses have been booked against the reserves as per the new guidelines.
– The other key indicators such as new client additions (18 for the year), order intake (312 Mn usd), utilization etc have been healthy.

Overall, the results have been as expected and not really spectacular. However the current valuations continue to assume much worse and hence the stock continues to be undervalued. I have updated the valuation spreadsheet and uploaded it again(valuationtemplateNIIT2009).

I personally feel, that my net margin assumption of 7.5% may be too conservative and the company may be able to maintain net margins in the region of 10%. If that turns out to be the case, there could be a higher upside to the stock price.

Cheviot company
I have analysed cheviot company earlier. The main thesis behind this idea can be summarized as follows – the company net of cash and equivalents is selling at 1 or less times annual earnings.The company has an average earnings power of 14-15 Crs per year and can valued at around 200 crs (versus 80 Crs market cap).

I recently reviewed the annual report and did not like what I saw, mainly on how the company is using the excess cash. A few key points from my annual report analysis are

– The company recorded a topline growth of around 5% (inspite of a drop in volumes) and a bottom line which was flat or up a few percentage point (one needs to exclude the impact of other income which is mainly from equity investments and mutual funds). The same is visible in the cash flow from operations too.
– The operating and net margins from core operations has remained steady inspite of the turmoil in the export markets and other issues such as labor.
– The investments on books have dropped by 20 crs and there seems to be an unexplained loan/ advance of the same amount on the balance sheet. The company had invested the surplus cash in the equity markets and has seen a drop in the value of the holdings. The company also took some losses through the profit and loss statement due to the sale of some holdings.
– The outlook for the next year looks bad due to the high jute prices and recession in the global market. The bottom line and hence the stock price could remain depressed.

So why am I annoyed with the results
– For starters, the company has taken the surplus cash and invested in the equity markets. That does not seem to be their core skills. In addition, I don’t think they have done a great job of it anyway. The market value has dropped by 50%, which seems to be roughly in line with the market level. So the treasury department is barely keeping up with the market or earning a few points above it.
– The dividend payout has been reduced this year due to the drop in profits (from other income). I am fairly irritated by this reduction as the company is drowing in cash, does not have too much use for it in the core business and is investing it in the stock market (not too well )
– There is an unexplained 20 Cr advance to someone. There are no other details provided on this transaction. This is not a related party transaction, but at the same time I would prefer more disclosure.
– A donation of 3 Crs (LY 2.5 Crs) !!

I am annoyed mainly by the capital allocation skills being displayed by the management. They are holding excess cash and are neither able to deploy in the core business and at the same time not ready to return it to the shareholders.

I have been slow in learning this fact, but catching onto it – Managements which show poor capital allocation skills and hoard cash, destroy value and the market may never assigns a decent multiple to such a businesses.

I do not have plans to sell the stock, but plan to monitor it closely. If I don’t see an improvement or change in the capital allocation policy of the management, I may decide to exit the stock.

I initiated the analysis of Patni computers in my last post. The rest of the analysis follows

Competitive analysis
The IT services industry is a very competitive industry driven by scale, customer relationships and management quality.

I think there is a low level of differentiation in the industry (contrary to what each company claims in its annual report) and most of the companies provide a similar product.

There is a decent amount of lockin at the customer level. Most companies including patni have a high % of repeat business and are able to leverage these relationships and customer lockin to sell additional services. However there is a substantial amount of competition now and it is no longer a given that a company will always maintain the same level of engagement at a client.

Patni has had a high concentration of revenue from its top customers. This has however been reducing in the last few years which is a good thing.

Finally management quality is an important factor in the IT industry, which I evaluate in the next section

Management quality checklist

– Management compensation: The founders and executive directors are entitled to a pension equal to 50% of last pay after 62 yrs of age. I cannot fathom the logic of this compensation. The current value of this obligation is almost 35 Crs and increasing. This is around 1% of the company’s market cap. Although not a large amount by itself, I cannot see any precedent for this kind of compensation in any other company in the industry. The compensation for the top management including the founders is almost 8% of net profit. This level of compensation is quite high and above the industry average. In addition this represents a 50% increase in 2008, when the performance does not justify such an increase.
– Capital allocation record: average record. The ROE has been high and the management has not blown too much cash on accquisitions, but as other IT companies, the company is holding too much cash. In addition the dividend payouts are not commensurate with the profit levels.
– Shareholder communication – good and in line with other IT services companies
– Accounting practise – The disclosure levels are good, in line with other IT company. However the company has around 185 Crs of hedge related liability on the balancesheet. I have not been able to find the details, but I can also see a 144 crs hedge reserve. This looks like a writeoff of the hedging losses without passing it through P&L. This is aggressive accounting. On the other hand the company has also adopted AS30 (forex related accounting) in advance which is a positive. In addition the company has a translation adjustment of almost 110 Mn usd (500 Crs) in the GAAP statement. I have to evaluate how much of this loss will reverse due to forex changes and how much will have a pass through into the P&L statement depending on the nature of the derivative contracts.
– Conflict of interest and related party transactions – Nothing stands out in terms of related party transactions. As stated earlier, the compensation is quite high and the same is confirmed in this section too.
– Performance track record – average. The management has shown average performance in terms of the topline and bottom line growth. On absolute basis the performance is good, but average in comparison to the industry.

Valuation
The key to valuing an IT services company is to estimate its underlying earnings power. The net profit numbers for most companies has been fluctuating a lot due to forex changes. In addition, the current tax levels are too low due to imminent expiration of the tax holidays.

Patni had a forex gain of almost 103 Crs in 2007 and a loss of 83 Crs in the current year. The tax as a % of PBT has dropped from 16% of PBT in 2007 to around 5% in 2008. Clearly a 5% tax rate is not sustainable.

As a final adjustment to the valuation, one must also adjust the impact of the stock options (or RSU now). I have made the following assumptions in arriving at my final numbers (these can ofcourse be debated)

Tax as % of PBT = 25%
Future earning power = 7.5% of sales (7.5 % net margin) excluding the impact of forex. Current net margins are around 12-14%.
Cost of outstanding options = 152 Crs
Dilution due to options = 1.17 cr additional shares

If we consider the above assumptions, a PE of 14 (which is not aggressive for a company with 8-10% growth and ROE of 15%+) and cash on books of around 1300 Crs, the intrinsic value is 6000-6300 Crs.

Scenario analysis
The above valuation assumes a very modest topline growth (around 10% per annum) and a negative growth for net profits (due to falling net margins and higher taxation).

The company could get a better valuation if it is able to hold its net margins and reduce the forex losses. I think the performance risk for the company are low as the current market enviorment is as bad as it can get – drop in demand, forex losses etc.

conclusion
Patni is a decent undervalued idea. However due to the various management issues outlined earlier and average performance in the past, I will not look at the company as a long term holding. It would be good idea to hold the company as long as the undervaluation exists and then exit once the gap closes.

Disclaimer – I have a holding in the stock.