I have been studying the Indian auto component industry for the last few days. The industry appears to have a good future ahead (whether there are some good stocks at good valuation is something i need to check).
The auto industry has two main channel – OEM and After sales. The industry has been restricted mainly to the domestic industry in the past and was thus tied to the fortune of the domestic auto industry (which in turn is cyclical).
A few changes have happened which have opened up the export market to this industry
– Recognition of India for its technical manpower. This is crucial especially in auto which involves a lot of R&D and design for new components at the higher end of the value chain
– Low cost labor
– Opening up of the Auto sector by the Indian government, due to which the global majors such as ford, GM etc setup shop in India and started sourcing from local suppliers. This helped in improving the competitiveness of the Indian auto component makers
– increase in scale of the domestic auto component makers and foray into the export market
Industry landscape
Some of the key firms in the industry in terms of their size are
– Bharat forge
– MICO
– Motherson Sumi
– Exide
– Sundaram fastners
Porter’s 5 factor analysis
Barriers to entry
– Technology: several auto components have a high technology component and can be produced by only those companies which have access to the technology or have developed it themselves. As a result most of the auto makers specialize in specific components
– Economies of scale
– Brand is crucial, more so in the Spares market (and as a result a distribution network too)
– Customer relationship in the form of long term contracts
Rivalry among firms
Rivalry among firms would be high in Spares market, but lesser in the export markets wherein the norm is long term contract. In addition the industry has high technology component and hence the industry does not deal in completely commodity product. However competition could be from other firms from other countries in a similar product line
Supplier power should be low as the key raw material is steel which in itself is a commodity
Buyer power is high especially for the OEM market and with high competition between auto makers there should be a constant pricing pressure on the auto component makers going forward
I would consider the threat of substitute product as low
The key success factors for the industry going forward should
– Continued investment into technology/ process to build barriers to competition and provide a cost and quality advantage to the customer
– Pursuit of economies of scale to be cost competitive. It should be in both production and in R&D
– Developing strong customer relationship through quality and reliable supply
Key risks
– Pricing would remain under pressure going forward
– Inability to meet the supply schedules of the customer
– Development of alternative outsourcing locations
The industry is into a growth phase. However the market also seems to have recognized that and most of the companies seem to be fairly valued.
Black Swan effect – Fat outliers / Why EMT varies from reality
EMT – Efficient market hypothesis has been debated to death. There are people who swear by it, atleast in the weak form.
One area where EMT differs from reality is in its modeling of outliers, rare events or black swan (This is the term used by Nicholas M Taleb).
To get a better understand of this topic, I have been reading the book – Fooled by randomness – by Nicholas M Taleb. He uses a lot of real life examples to explain some very complex concepts.
Some ideas which have remained with me are
– Black swan or Rare events or Outlier events happen more frequently than one would think so (drawback of the EMT ? )
– The EMT models the market by normal distribution, which does not take account of these outlier events. Hence you find these spectacular hedge fund blow up like LTCM where a rare event takes the fund down
– People under estimate chance in life and attribute it to skill (in investing too)
– Human mind is not designed to be rational, especially in the area of finance and we tend to make emotional suboptimal decision
– The pain of loss is 2-2.5 times more than the pleasure of gain. As a result, if one has the tendency to check his portfolio too often, it could have a negative impact on the performance ( if one were to act irrationally based on the short term performance )
– Most of the studies on long term performance of stocks / mutual funds have a survivorship bias due to which the performance appears better than it actually is (for ex: the current sensex does not have all those companies which were a part of it and went bankrupt or got knocked off)
A good book and a must read !!
Buffett’s 1974 Forbes interview
A classic !!
http://www.maoxian.com/archive/20030108.html
No one Looks good !! – lesson for investors
A fantastic post on the Fool’s BRK board from elias fardo. Its a must read for a value investor
http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2005/050802.htm?ref=foolwatch
If one were to follow these principles, he could the harshad mehta bust, the MS shoes debacles, the fraudulent IPO’s of the past and a host of other scams.