Latest stories

Banking

B

I have written earlier on banks

On valuation approach of banks

More thoughts on valuation of banks

Various factors to evaluate banks

Margin of safety and Banks

I recently posted on a Financial services company ‘
sundaram Finance’ which has a business model similar to banks.

I have been analysing banks as a group, trying to understand their business models better. I found the following articles useful to understand the working of a bank

Asset liability management function of banks

Various factors in evaluating banks

NPA and various factors in understanding Bank NPA’s

A few additional thoughts on the business model of banks

– The traditional lending business of banks is now becoming a smaller portion of the business. The ‘other income’ portion which comes from various activities such as distribution of financial products, cash management etc is now becoming more important as this income is not sensitive to interest rate changes and requires less capital
– The % of other income to total profit is higher for the newer private banks than the PSU banks. In addition lower NPA and more profitable growth has resulted in a higher valuation for private banks such as HDFC, ICICI etc
– Banks have been consistently increasing the proportion of their variable rate products. This enables the bank to reduce their Asset liability mismatch.
– Banks profits, especially of PSU banks were subdued last year due to the increase in deposit rates. However PSU bank assets tend to follow the higher rates with a lag. Private banks are able to manage these fluctuations better through various derivative products. I think PSU banks are still lagging in this field. As a result it is likely that several PSU banks will see an expansion of margins as deposit rates stabilize and the Asset yields improve
– NPA’s in most PSU banks though higher than Private banks are still better than a few years ago

I have done a preliminary analysis of the various banks and have found Private sector banks to be fairly or in some cases slightly over-valued. However there are some PSU banks such as Allahabad bank, which I feel are undervalued. I will be posting on Allahabad bank and a few other banks later.

How to make 6.4 lacs by investing 1000 per month

H

Is’nt the above title like a typical get rich quick scheme ? Frankly there is no magic in the above. The approach is very simple. The NSE or BSE index on an average has returned around 16-17% per annum for the last 10-15 years. So if one can invest via SIP (systematic investment plan) around 1000 Rs per month, it should amount to around 6.4 lacs after 10 years. This is with the assumption that the gain is evenly distributed ( @ 1.4 % per month) across the entire 120 month time period.

Ofcourse reality is not that convinient. However volatility generally helps in improving the overall returns in an SIP plan. So if one can maintain the discipline of investing 1000 per month irrespective of how the market is doing in the short term, it will work out in the long run.

Let me give a few scenarios (investing 1000/ month)


Anyone can follow this approach by regularly investing in an ETF or an index fund for the long term and come out well. Even better if you can find a mutual fund which can beat the market by 2-3% point.

So where’s the catch? well there is none really. The main problem is us. Think of it … where is the sex appeal or sizzle in this strategy. If you discuss this with your friend, do you think you will get anything more than a yawn? Who is going to be impressed with this approach ?

I know what comes to everyone’s mind (mine included), namely – I am a better investor. I can make 25% per annum and have beaten the daylights out of the market for last 2 years. Who wants this boring strategy, when I can do all kinds of fancy stuff, have fun at it and boast about it too. Maybe its true, but can you be sure?

So the question is – is it better to follow a known strategy and build a decent nest egg in the next 10-15 years, or try for the moon which may or may not happen.

I am not different than anyone else and tend to follow both approaches at the same time. I prefer not to discount a simple and effective approach. As a result a portion of my portfolio is always indexed and in SIP.

Analysis – Sundaram Finance

A

About
SF(sundaram finance) is an NBFC promoted by the same group which controls companies such sundaram clayton etc. The company is the business of hire purchase and leasing in the automotive sector. In addition the company has subsidiaries for housing finance, asset management, Infotech, insurance etc.

Financials
The company reported a consolidated revenue of 1100 crs with a growth of around 25%. The company has had decent topline and bottom line growth in double digits for the last 5-6 years. The ROE has improved around 10% to almost 15% now. The company also has extremely low NPA of around 0.5% and CAR ratio in excess of 12%.
The company has AAA ratings and has been able to get funding from banks and other institution at competitive rates.

Positives
The company is a well managed conservative company. It has show good growth in the last 5 years, with a decent ROE and low NPA. In addition the company has a strong brand name in its segment and a good distribution and marketing infrastructure which is important in the hire/purchase and lease business.
In addition the company is now expanding into new growth areas such as home finance, asset management and insurance. Several of these subsidiaries are now doing well and have turned profitable in the past few years

Risks
The core business of the company is still hire purchase and leasing in the auto sector. The auto sector has been in a growth phase in the last 5 years. As a result the company has been able to show good results and low NPA. However a downturn could slowdown the topline and bottom line and also increase the NPA’s.
The company is expanding into various financial services such as insurance, housing finance, infotech etc. These businesses are still new and have just turned profitable. However there are still risks in these businesses till they mature.

Valuation
It is important to do a sum of part valuation of the company as the company has several subsidiaries, JVs and associates. A conservative valuation would give the company a value of approximately 2000 Crs which is a 35% discount to the current mcap of 1275 Crs. An optimistic valuation would give a value of 2700 Crs which is more than double the current mcap.
To put it differently, the current mcap accounts for the parent company only and all the JV’s, subsidiary and associates are available for free.

The caveat however is that the investments in associates are mainly in group companies and it is unlikely that these holding would ever be sold. The company would be able to get good dividends from these holdings, but the full value is not likely to be realised.

The Reliance effect

T

update : Oct 09
well, the euphoria has increased even more since i posted, which was just a few days back. Reliance and a few other stocks like L&T are the new dotcoms of 2007. I am getting a sense of deja-vu ..can see a replay of 2000 here, alteast the initial part. Soon we will have people justifying the current run-up saying how it is ‘different’ this time.
Personally, in this bi-polar market i can see quite a few undervalued stocks and would prefer to concentrate on them than get pulled into this frenzy.

The S&P CNX nifty (NSE index) has risen by around 13.2 % in the last one month with the main move happening after the fed rate cut on 18th. The funny thing is that all reliance stocks have shot up since then.

The following is the increase in the price of these stocks in the last one month

RIL – reliance industries – 20.5%
Reliance energy – 75%
RNRL – 115%
Reliance communication – 13.1%
Reliance Chemotex – 147%
RPL – 41%

So I guess anything with the name reliance is in a bull market. The industry does not matter, only the management should be with reliance.

I cannot figure out what is happening. There seems to be two markets now. One is in a bull phase consisting of reliance stocks and a few others, with the rest of the market more or less even. So my approach is to stay away from the overvalued stuff and hold or buy what seems undervalued. Ofcourse i am not into momentum trading, so this approach may not work for those who are into that.

Disclosure – I hold RIL and REL. So I have one portion of my portfolio galloping whereas the rest is barely moving.

Subscription

Enter your email address if you would like to be notified when a new post is posted:

I agree to be emailed to confirm my subscription to this list

Recent Posts

Select category to filter posts

Archives