CategoryInvestment ideas

Quick analysis : Two investment ideas

Q

I have been analysing and following these two companies for quite some time. Around 1-2 months back, the price for both the companies fell to around 50% of my estimate of intrinsic value. As a result I have built an almost 70-80% position in these two companies

The companies are Maruti suzuki and CRISIL. Both companies are part of my core porfolio now, so I am very likely to be baised about them now (please do post any negative feedback about the companies)

You can find the analysis for maruti suzuki here. During the month of november, due to the credit crunch and general slowdown, car sales dropped dramatically. The market reacted sharply and pushed the stock price below 500 for a short period of time. The assumption built in that price was that maruti’s business was permanently damaged due to the slow down.

I don’t think that is the case. I agree with overall assessment that car sales would be weak for 2009 or even 2010. However my investment approach does not involve focussing on the next month or next quarter results. I prefer to look at how the company would do for the next 5-7 years as my holding period is typically more that 2-3 years.

The stock price has appreciated almost 20% since the lows. Does that prove my thesis? I don’t look at short term price action to prove my investment thesis. It is the business performance over the next 1-2 years which will prove whether I am right or wrong. If I used short term price as a validation, then I would invariably be wrong for the first 6-12 months as most of my picks have a bad short term outlook.

The second company is crisil. I have looked and written about CRISIL in the past. There is a good analysis of the company here.

Key plusses and minuses for the company
– The company has a very high competitive advantage in the business. This business has very high entry barriers and other companies cannot enter into this business easily
– The business needs low amounts of capital to grow and can re-invest this capital at very high rates of return
– The risk for ratings agencies in the US and other markets does not hold at the same level for CRISIL. CRISIL was not involved directly in rating subprime instruments and hence should not get impacted directly.
– There has been a reputational loss for the ratings agency. However in the current sceanrio there is no alternative (atleast in india) to the rating agencies.
– The current price discounts a lot of the negatives and more for these companies

There are definite risks for both the companies. At the same time, you will never find a company which has no business and valuation risk at the same time. If the business risk is low, then the valuation risk is high (sky high valuations). On rare ocassions, you may find a neglected company with low business and valuation risk. In such as case, you can load up on the company, but you will need patience for the market to discover the value

Disclosure : As I said earlier in the post, I have positions in both the companies. I have built these positions in the preceeding months and may or may not publish when I exit these positions. So please read my disclaimer and then decide for yourself.

NIIT tech: A falling knife ?

N

I received a question : NIIT tech has dropped from 100 to around mid 50s. Is it a falling knife which one should avoid ?

I have written a post on the above topic earlier. So the point is how does one avoid a falling knife scenario ? In other words when it is wise to increase the holding as the stock price is dropping versus avoid averaging down.

Two factors
I would answer the above question based on two key factors one should keep in mind when purchasing a stock. The first factor is the intrinsic value of the stock. One should have decent idea of the Intrinsic value range of a stock. If the stock price is dropping and the stock is more undervalued now, one can look at increasing the holding.

The second factor is position size or risk management. Personally when I am looking at a stock, I make a decision on whether the stock would be a part of my core portfolio or the cheap-graham portfolio. Once I have made that decision, I have pre-set limit on the position size. One can have an amount or percentage of the portfolio – position size. I typically start off with a 50% position (50% of the full position) and keep adding as the stock price drops.

Once I had built the full position, I will not add to the position even if the stock price is dropping. This is the key to risk management. I regularly check my thesis to confirm if any of my basic assumptions are incorrect and if my estimate of intrinsic value is too high. However I will not add to my position even when the stock price falls. There is no averaging down for me, once I have built a full position

70% strike rate
I have read that most of the top investors typically have 70-80% hit rate. That is 20-30% of their stock picks result in losses, either due to bad luck or incorrect analysis. I don’t believe I will do better than that. I have now started working with an assumption that 20-30% of my picks will fail. In such a scenario, the risk management aspect is crucial. To do well on a portfolio basis, my successful picks should do better than my failures.

What about NIIT tech ?
In the case of NIIT tech or any other company, my focus is on intrinsic value and not on the stock price. The stock price can get disconnected from the intrinsic value for sometime, but it eventually converges to it.
My own estimates of intrinsic value for the company have not changed. The current quarter results show a bottom line drop of around 50%, mainly due to forex losses. I do not consider them as core losses (just as forex gains are not permanent gains). I have seen a lot of people get all worked up about forex losses, which does not make sense to me.
Unless the company is speculating on forex (via non effective hedges), I think the forex gains and losses should even out over the period of few years and hence one should be concentrating on the core profits to value the company.

As an example look at the results of the airlines such as southwest (in the US). Southwest airlines has been consistently profitable for the last 20+ years. They have had 2-3 quarters of hedging related losses due to oil price volatility. Do you think they have a problem in their core operations?

Anyway, I digress. Coming back to NIIT tech, I have not changed my estimate of intrinsic value and I have already built my planned position. As a result even if the price drops, I will not add to my position to manage the risk (if I am wrong about NIIT tech).

Management issue
However if you believe that in light of the satyam episode, you cannot trust the management , then the only course of action is to exit the stock.
Personally, the moment I lose faith on any management and cannot trust them, I will exit the stock irrespective of the loss I have to take on my position.

As an aside, my previous post was in jest. I received a few personal emails ‘challenging’ my prediction and one guy asked me why I did not predict the level, if I knew the time . I have no clue where the market will be in the future. However if you want to pay me, I can guess for you 🙂

A Graham style deep value stock portfolio

A

Benjamin graham is considered as the dean of value investing. Warren buffet was graham’s student and considers him as his mentor. Buffett’s followed graham’s approach to value investing in the early part of his career. However later, he expanded on graham’s approach and started focussing on the quality of the business too.

Graham’s approach is basically picking stocks which are statistically cheap. What that means is that the stock is cheap based on various quantitative measures such as mcap being less than Net current assets, or the stock is selling for less than cash on books. The disadvantage of this approach is that you may end up buying some complete dogs which are cheap for a reason. The underlying business would be going downhill and so the value is just an illusion.

Graham understood this and he circumvented it by diversifying. So the key point in building a portfolio of cheap graham style stocks is to diversify the holding. It makes sense to hold 15-20 stocks at a time and to keep selling the stocks when they reach 80-90% of intrinsic value and to replace them with other cheap issues.

With the current drop, I can see more of such opportunities coming up. The last time I saw such an opportunity was in 2002-2003 time frame.

The initial filter criteria I am using is as follows

Mcap less than 500 crs
Debt / equity ratio less than 0.5
No loss in the preceeding 5-6 years
PE less than 7
ROE atleast 8-10%

I have been developing a list of such ideas and have loaded a list of possible ideas in google groups (stock screen graham). I have holdings in HTMT global, LMW and Denso india. I am still analysing the other stocks in the list and have yet to make up my mind on them.

The key point, and I repeat, is to hold a large portfolio of these stocks via diversification. Some will turn out to be clunkers, but on an aggregate the portfolio should do well.

Now you may have a valid counterpoint – why buy this stuff when there are good companies getting cheap by the day. That is true ..but if like me you also take a long time to analyse each company, then the above mechanical approach is a quick way to assemble a decent portfolio. If you have the cash and the nerve (I could use a stronger word here 🙂 ) to invest when everyone is pessimistic, then the mechanical graham style of investing can be used to quickly assemble a decent portfolio while the opportunity lasts.

Please keep in mind that this list is just raw analysis and not a final list of stocks from which I plan to build my graham style portfolio. I will keep adding and dropping stocks and will upload the revised list when I do so.

Overseas investing

O

I was recently chatting with sandesh and he asked me a question – Why don’t you invest in US based companies? Is it due to the fact that you consider them outside your circle of competence or some other reason ?

My response was – As an indian resident, I cannot invest out of india and that is the main reason for not looking at US companies.

So much for due diligence ! It seems one can invest abroad through ICICI direct and this facility has been available for some time. I do not know if there are some restrictions on the type of stocks one can buy and so would appreciate if some one can leave a comment on it.

I have been following a few companies in the US, mainly out of curiosity and as a learning experience. The one company I would like to own is Berkshire hathaway. This company is run by warren buffett and as most of the readers of this blog would know, I am a Buffett fan.

Warren buffett has been the chairman and CEO of this company since 1967 or 68 (don’t have the exact date). The company stock price and intrsinic value has grown by 20%+ since he took over the management of the company (you do the math of what 1000$ invested then would be worth now after almost 40 years of compounding at 20%+ per annum).

The core business of the company is insurance. In addition Buffett has invested capital by accquiring a collection of good companies or by investing in stocks. The company is a major shareholder in companies such as Cocacola, Amex, washington post etc and a 100% owner of companies such as See’s candies, DQ, GIECO etc.

It is diffcult to analyse the company in a short post and I will do a detailed post later if I can confirm that an Indian investor can invest in this company. However irrespective of the outcome, I would recommend everyone to read Buffett’s letter to shareholders (download here) and analyse the company. I have read these letters multiple times and I can tell you from personal experience that these letters are the best education in economics, finance and investing.

I have analysed the company to understand the economics of an insurance business and also to see the disclosure a shareholder friendly management (Buffett is known for his shareholder orientation and ‘really’ considers them as partners).

I am uploading the valuation of the company (BRK valuation.xls) in google groups (see here). The company is undervalued from my perspective. I would encourage you to download the annual report and read through it. It is a big report and takes effort to understand it, but it is worth it.

Caution: The company is undervalued, but the stock is not cheap. The ‘A’ stock is worth around 100000 usd (50 lacs per share) and the ‘B’ stock (which is 1/30 of A stock) is worth around 3200 usd (1.6-1.7 lacs per share). The reason for this high price is that buffett has not split the stock for the last 40 years (read the owners manual in the Annual report for the reason).

Portfolio details

P

I have received a lot of emails and comments asking me about the composition of my portfolio. I have discussed most of the stocks, which form my holdings on the blog. It would be strange if I said a stock was attractive and went and bought something else. However there still seems to be quite a bit of curiosity.

I have decided to disclose my portfolio after multiple requests for the sake of transparency. I am uncomfortable discussing my portfolio and its performance on the blog as the key purpose of this blog is to share my learnings and not to provide tips or boast about my performance.
So here goes –

Some disclaimers
1. I am not recomending any stocks in this list. Please read the disclaimer at the end of my blog ..blah blah blah. You get the point
2. My portfolio is usually stable. But considering the way the market is dropping, it has become volatile not only in terms of value but in terms of holdings too. The problem now is not of finding undervalued stocks, but of picking the best among the undervalued ones. On top of that, with every crash, new ideas keep popping up. So this list will definitely change in the next few months
3. I am not obliged to disclose any stocks I add or drop in the future. I may or may not disclose what I buy or sell. So please do not buy based on this list below.
4. I am fine with a 70% success rate, i.e 7 out of 10 of my ideas working out. I typically don’t lose much as I keep a margin of safety in my purchases. So although some of the picks may not work out as planned, I have been able to do quite well on a complete portfolio basis.

Core portfolio (all stocks are planned to be equal wieghted even if they are not now)

Balmer lawrie
Gujarat gas
Novartis
Lakshmi machine works
Bharat electronics
Ashok leyland
Asian paints
Merck
NIIT tech + Patni (in combination will be a single position)
Honda siel
Concor
Grindwell norton
GSK consumer (on watch list)

Graham style portfolio (smaller positions, cheap stocks)
VST
Ultramarine pigments
India nippon
Manugraph (on watch list)
Cheviot company
HTMT global
Denso india

I may be building positions in some of these ideas in the subsequent months. I may also decide to drop some if I find more attractive ideas.

Added point: I am very particular about valuation (after everything else checks out) . I will rarely create a meaningful position unless the price is right. So please keep in mind that the analysis date is not the date on which i created a full position. It is only the date when I finished analysis. The average price in each case varies depending on when I started building the position.

I will not be disclosing anything more on my portfolio beyond what I have done already and I hope all of you would understand that.

Analysis : Lakshmi machine works

A

About
Lakshmi machine works is the biggest textile machinery supplier with a market share of around 60% of the indian market. In addition the company also has a machine tool and foundry division which together contribute to less than 10% of the total revenue.
The company’s main market is india and is one of the lowest cost suppliers in the country. In addition the company is also planning to setup a unit in china for textile machinery and is also focussing on the other divisions

Financials
The company’s performance has improved in the last 5 years. This improvement has been on the backdrop of an upcycle in the textile business and the removal of the Textile quotas in the international markets.
The company’s ROE has improved from around 8% to around 30%. The sales increased 4 times during this period. In addition the net profit has gone up by 10 times due to the increase in the net margins from 4.7% to around 10%+ during the same period.
A more commendable improvement has been the improvement in the Wcap turns. The company has become working capital negative and now has almost 600+ crs on the balance. As a result of this improvement the company has a very lean balance sheet where out of the total 800 Crs, only 200 Crs is the invested capital. Due to this the Asset turns is very high at 11.5.

Positives
The company is a one of lowest cost producers in the industry. In addition the company has improved its capital efficiency dramatically during this upcycle. This improvement has come as a result of the improvement in inventory turns and recievable turns.
In addition the company has seen an improvement in net margins due to elimination of interest expenses and other overheads. This has come about inspite of increase in RM prices.
The company is also spending almost 1% of revenue on R&D which is a good, but a higher spend could be better. The company has a decent order book too.
In addition the company expects a replacement demand of around 28 Mn and new demand of around 29 Mn due to growth of the textile industry (page 24 of Annual report)

Risks
The risks are painfully obvious. The textile industry was hit initially due to rupee appreciation and then due to the credit crisis. During such times, CAPEX expenditure is usually put on hold or delayed. As a result the company expects the demand to drop by 10 to 20% in the current year.
Due to demand drop in the international market, other foreign manufacturers could become more aggressive in the India impacting the profitability of the company.

Competitive analysis
The Industry has decent entry barriers. LMW has fairly depreciated investments which would require quite a bit of investment by any new player. In addition LMW also has the benefit of economies of scale due to which it has lower cost in the industry
There is a certain amount of Lock-in too as once a textile producer buys the machinery from one supplier, it would tend to continue with it as there are cost benefits in terms of maintenance, training and CAPEX.
There are also learning curve barriers and contractual commitment barriers in the industry. In all, LMW enjoys a certain amount of competitive advantage in the industry which also shows up as high market share and high ROE.

Valuation
The company has almost 600Crs+ cash on the book. Net of the cash, the valuation is around 200-300 Crs. The net profit for last year was around 240 Crs out of which the other income was around 60 crs. As a result the core income was around 160 crs. Even under a sceanrio where the net profit drops by 50%, the current valuation is around 2-3 times the depressed profit.
A DCF (discounted cash flow) analysis assuming a growth of 7-8% and net margins of 8-10% gives an intrinsic value of around 4500. The current price is around 20% of this value

Scenario analysis
The above DCF analysis can be done with varying assumptions of growth and net margins.
If the company grows at 8% and has 8% margins during the next 7-8 years, the value is around 3900. This looks like a fairly conservative scenario for the next few years. Even with an extremely low margin of 5% for the next 7-8 years the value comes to 2000.
The above scenarios assume that 2009 and part of 2010 would be bad with net profit dropping by 50%.

conclusion
The company has been priced as if it will be out of business soon. The company is being valued at 250-300 Crs net of cash for all the fixed assets, intellectual property, customer relationships etc. In effect the market is saying that company will shut down in the next 1-2 years.
The credit crisis and subsequent recession in the textile industry is bound to impact companies like LMW. However this is part of a normal business cycle. Capital good are the first to bear the brunt of a recession. However that does not mean that the industry is heading for extinction. The pricing however seems to be pointing to that scenario

Some Q&A
I am putting some possible questions and answers which could be on your mind

Q1: The textile industry is in recession and the outlook is cloudy. Should we not wait till it becomes clear ?
The future is never completely clear. If it was clear in 2007 that the textile industry would be in recession in 2009, the stock price would not have gone up to 3000+. In 2007 the market was pricing the stock for a glorious future and now is pricing for complete disaster. The reality is always in between

Q2: The price could drop further. Should I wait for a better price?
The stock is selling at around 30-40% of intrinsic value. No one can predict how much lower it can go. I personally think bottom fishing is a waste of time. Time and energy should be spent on understanding the company, its industry and the future economics of the company than trying to get the last 10% in terms of price

Q3: All the stock analyst and gurus have sell recommendation on the stock. What makes you think you are right and all the others are wrong?
I don’t know if I am right or not. What I like are the odds. There is a high probability that the company and its stock could do well in the future. How well, I don’t know. I could be wrong too. However this is not the only stock in my portfolio. The reason for having a diversified portfolio is that I may be wrong 30-40% of the time and still do well on an overall basis. In addition the downside on the stock is protected as the company is now selling at very low valuations and is priced for disaster.

Q4: The volumes are low and stock is exhibiting weakness
Lets give the stock some horlicks 🙂 ..how does it matter if you plan to hold the stock for the long term. If the volumes are low and there is weakness, it is a good time to buy. When everything clear up, and optimisim and strenght returns it would a good time to sell.

Q5: The technicals for the stock are weak
Huh !! sorry we are from a different planet !!

Analysis : BEL annual results

A

Read my earlier analysis of BEL here

Results summary
The company had an average year in 2007-2008. The sales growth was around 7% and the profit growth was around the same. The net profit margin improved to around 20%. The company maintained the ROE numbers at the 25%+ levels and continues to be a zero debt- cash rich company
The open order book has now increased to 9586 Crs with around 3100 Crs executable in the current year. This provide visibility to around 80% of the annual revenue.
The business is skewed to the fourth quarter due to the projects nature of the business and hence the company accrues almost 60% of its profit in the last quarter.

The positives
The company maintained its ROE, margins and other key performance indicators such as order book, Fixed asset Turnover ratio, Raw material costs etc.

In addition the company is now spending almost 5.1% of revenue on R&D and plans to increase it to 8-9% of sales. This is a very positive development as R&D is crucial in this business . BEL is among the very few indian companies which spend on R&D and may have the highest spend in terms of sales. The company has been developing a lot of new products and now gets almost 83% of the turnover from indigenously developed products

The company has conservative accounting for foreign exchange (Company has no derivatives) and charges all changes to the Profit and loss statement.

Finally the company continues to be a debt free company with almost 2400 Crs in cash on the books. Net of cash, the ROE numbers of the company are fairly high, which reflects the strong competitive advantage of the company.

The negatives
The number that concerns for me is the high level of recievables. The recievables have shot up from around 1000 odd crores in 2005-06 to around 2080 Crs in 2007-08. As a result recievables have consumed almost 60% of the free cash for the last 2 years. This is very discomforting and will have to watched closely. The management has indicated that they are planning to bring it down, however I am still concerned about this number which is now a red flag.

The other concern is the very high skew for the fourth quarter. It is not very healthy to book so much business in a single quarter, especially the year end to make the numbers. Projects type business (for ex: blue star) have higher skews in Q4, however such skew results in poor recievables turns, bad debts and other issues (more on that later).

The valuation
The company now sells at around 6 times earnings (net of cash). So the market is clearly expecting the company to perform pretty badly. Now this is a company earning very high return on capital, growing in mid to low teens and in a business which is pretty immune to the economy (defence spending). In addition, though private companies are now being allowed in defence since 2001, BEL has been able to do well.
Other than the fact that the company is PSU, I cannot find a reason for almost a 50-60% drop in the stock price (other than that the market as a whole has declined).

Added note : I would not read too much into the Q1 results. As I said earlier in the post, if the company books too much revenue in Q4, the next years Q1 results get impacted.

I have loaded the a detailed analysis of the company in google groups.

Analysis – Ashok leyland, Suraj diamonds etc

A

I had suggested to the readers of this blog a few weeks back to send me a list of companies to analyse. I am posting on a few from the list

Ashok Leyland – I have written on Ashok leyland here and here. I have been analysing the annual results of the company for 2007-2008 and the key points are summarized below

Postitives :
The company has maintained its ROE and capital efficiency (Wcap ratio) inspite of tough market conditions. The sales growth was around 6%, which is decent in view of the slowdown in the Commercial vehicle markets. The netprofit growth and margin were also satisfactory. The company has also improved its market share in the current year.

In addition to the above, the company is investing in capacity and also in R&D (at 2%+ of sales). The company is also investing in several JVs for exports, electronic components for vehicles etc.

Negatives :
Competition in the industry is increasing with a lot of foreign players coming into the country. As a result the obsolence of models will speed up. There would also be a higher spend on R&D and Marketing to manage the competitive pressure.

The company is also expanding internationally which in itself carries a higher risk.
The company is a cyclical industry where the demand could be weak for some more time. This is strictly not a negative as the long term competitive advantages of the company are still intact.

I have uploaded a detailed analysis of Ashok leyland in google groups here (valuationtemplatev2ALLaug2008.xls)

A valid question would be – Why not invest in tata motors which is the clear industry leader. To that my response is – Tata motors as a company is too complex for me (maybe not for others) to analyse. The company has a lot of moving parts now. It a heavy vehicle, car manufacturer combined. In addition with foreign accqusitions of Jaguar and other brands there are additional unknowns too. In comparison AL is a much simpler company to understand and analyse. Hence my preference for Ashok leyland.

Suraj Diamonds
The company is in the diamond cutting and jewelry business. The revenue has grown by almost 300% in the last 5 years and so has the net profit. However the net margins are very low at around 2-3%. In the addition the ROE is less 10% even after improvements in the last few years. The company has low free cash flows. The net profits in aggregate are around 130 crs in the last 5 years. However around 50% have been used up for fixed asset and working capital. There has been a huge increase in the debtors position which is now around 1 years sales. The company looks cheap from a net profit perspective, however I am not too impressed by the ability of the business to generate free cash flow. There is fairly high increase in debtors which is quite risky in my opinion.

I would personally not proceed further with this stock untill I see the company is able to improve its free cash flow generation. The risk in such stocks is that the faster the company grows, the more capital either in form of debt or equity would required. This is fine in the short term, however if the business model generate poor free cash flows, then the stock only appears but is not really undervalued

A few additional companies have been emailed to me, which I have analysed in the past. I am providing the list and the links below

Maruti
HPCL – see here and here
Kothari products – It is still a net cash situation and an arbitrage opportunity too.
VST industries

Cement Industry – Stock analysis

C

I received a list of companies to analyse based on my earlier post. In order to do a better analysis, I am trying to club all the stocks from the same industry. As there are several cement companies in the list, I decided to take a stab at the cement stocks first.

My earlier analysis of the cement industry is here and here. In addition I have analysed the industry and updated my analysis in the file business analysis in the google group. Please have a look under the column commodity – cement.

The cement industry is a cyclical commodity industry where the profit and return on capital is dependent on the demand cycle picture. From the mid 90’s to 2002-2003 period, there was an excess of supply and hence prices were depressed. Most companies had poor to non-existent profits and accordingly the stock prices suffered. Since 2003, the demand has increased rapidly and so have the prices. The profit margins are now in excess of 20% for some companies and ROE in excess of 40% for companies such as ambuja cements. I personally think these are fairly high returns for this industry and the best of the companies in the industry would earn around a max of 20% over a business cycle.

Valuation of cement companies should not be done on the basis of peak earnings alone. This holds true for most commodity companies. Case in point – sugar companies. In 2006-2007, these companies appeared cheap based on their peak earnings. However when the cycle turned downwards, the stock prices got wacked. The economics of the cement industry are not as bad (there is lesser government intervention), however the valuation approach should be similar to the sugar industry. One has to be careful in extrapolating the peak earnings and assuming that the stock is undervalued.

Due to the cyclicality and commodity nature of the industry, analysis and valuation of cement companies is more diffcult as one has to figure out where the industry stands in terms of the business cycle . High returns can be made if one can predict the key turnaround points in the business cycle.

Mysore cement –
This is an interesting company. The company was taken over by the heidelberg group and made a tender offer to buy shares from the public at 54 Rs/ share in 2006 . SEBI directed the group to set the price at 72.5 per share. This was recently overturned by SAT and the heidelberg group can now initiate a tender offer to buy the shares from the public at Rs54 per share.

In addition the company alloted 66.5 Million shares at Rs 54 per share in 2006 to the group. This capital was used to pay off the accumulated debts and wipe out the accumulated losses. The company has also become profitable from 2007 since the new management took over.

In addition a recent news, indicates that indorama cement would be merging with mysore cement taking the capacity to 2.8 Million tonnes. The company further plans to expand the capacity to 5.9 Million tonnes.

The financial look good, with the company solidly in the black, no debt and cash of almost 180 crs on the books. The impact of the new management can clearly be seen from the P&L account, balance sheet improvement and aggressive plans of the company to expand capacity through mergers and greenfield projects.

So if everything is so good, then one should go and buy the stock? I would hold on that before I can figure out the following
– Cement is a cyclical industry. Currently the industry is on an upswing and hence all cement companies are making good money. How will mysore cement fare when the cycle turns south (supply exceeds demand)
– What is the cost structure for mysore cement? Cost is critical in a commodity industry such as cement.
– Future plans of the management. Scale is important in the industry. Mysore cement is still at 2.8 Million tonnes and even after capacity expansion would still be one of the smaller companies

One interesting development is the tender offer. The stock is quoting at around 30 Rs and the tender offer should be around 54 Rs. The stock may be a good arbitrage opportunity, even if the long term prospects of the company needs a more thorough analysis.

Ambuja cements
Ambuja cements has been one of most profitable cement companies in india and has made money even during the downturns. They have the highest net profit margins in the industry at 30% and ROE of almost 40%. Net profit margins have grown from 10% to around 30% and the profit as a result has grown by 8 times in the last 5 years.

The company sells at around 560 Crs/ Million tons of capacity compared to say 170 Crs/ Million tons of capacity for Mysore cement. The difference is high and understandable as Ambuja cement is a well run company with huge capacity and a very efficient cost structure.

The company is currently selling at a PE of 7 based on last year’s net profit numbers. Based on normalised profit margins of around 12-15%, the company is selling at a PE of around 12-13. I would say the company is undervalued by 20-25% at best.

If you believe that the net margins are sustainable, consider the following fact : Net margins in 2003 and before were around 10% and have expanded to around 30% in the last 2 years.

Grasim, ACC, Ultratech etc
Grasim has a blend of cement, VSF and other businesses. The cement business seems to be doing well in line with industry. The other companies such as ACC and ultratech have also been performing well in the last 2-3 years. Most of the top cement companies now have margins in the range of 18-22%, ROE in excess of 30% and high profit growth rates in excess of 20-30%.

The valuations of these companies are fairly close. Most of these tier I companies are selling at 7-8 times profit in comparison to the smaller companies which are selling at 4-5 times or lesser.

I am reaching the following conclusions after looking at the complete sector

– The cement industry has enjoyed very high growth rates and great profits for the last few years. The profits margins are not sustainable. New capacity, cost pressure and competition are bound to drive the margins to long term averages of around 10-12% in the next few years
– Most of the companies appear undervalued in terms of the last 2 years profits. However on the basis of normalized profits they are selling at 12-13 times earnings. At best, these companies appear undervalued by 20-25%. There may be a bit of undervaluation, but not by a huge amount.
– Considering the level of undervaluation in some sectors such as pharma, IT etc and the better economics enjoyed by those industries compared to Cement, I am personally not too keen on investing in the cement sector. If I had to pick up one cement company to put my money in for the long term, I would prefer ambuja cement (if I had to that is !!)

Rapid fire analysis of multiple stocks

R

In the previous post, I was asked to give an opinion on several stocks. I have fairly broad filters when selecting stocks. As a result I drop companies pretty quickly. Once they make through my filters, I spend quite a bit of time analysing and mulling over them. Frankly I don’t need more than 10-12 stocks to build a decent portfolio, so I don’t spend time on companies which don’t catch my attention, either due to the fundamentals or due to valuations

So here is my opionion on the stocks listed in the comments (please note the word opinion as I have really not done a detailed analysis on them)

Please note that for a stock to excite me, the fundamentals have to be good and the stock has to be fairly undervalued (selling at 50% of intrinsic value). So you may find that I am not too enthusiatic of some stocks if they don’t appear to be undervalued to me even if the fundamentals are good.

Following stocks are from mumbai jurno

Punj Lloyd – The net profits have grown by 30 times in the last 4 years. The company has a debt equity ratio of more than 1 which is on the higher side for my comfort. The market has recognized the rapid growth and inspite of the recent drop, the company is valued at 30 times its recent earnings. I personally will not invest in this stock for two reasons – I am not confident if the company can continue this level of growth and the valuation are on the higher side for me.

Voltas – I was invested in bluestar from 2003 to 2006 (see here). I exited blue star last year as I found the valuations to be on the higher side. The company has shown a high profit growth ( 5 times in last 5 years) and has a high ROE of almost 50%. The company has very low debt. Though the valuation (PE of around 20) is a bit on the higher side, I would personally put the company on my watch list and analyse it a bit further to make a decision.

Amararaja Batteries – This is the auto components industry. Overall I am not too excited by the economics of this industry. If the auto industry is under price pressure, it is bound to pass on those cost pressures to their suppliers. As a result auto component companies over a business cycle do not enjoy high profits. Most the companies in the industry do not have a high competitive advantage due buyer power, poor pricing strenght etc. I had analysed exide some time back, but never pulled the trigger. This is from memory – I think exide enjoys more than 50% market share in the industry. In such an industry a distant no.2 such as amaraja may not have very high pricing strength and may see its profits dip when the cycle turns downwards. So although the stock appears undervalued, I would be careful jumping into it. Looking into the rear view mirror (last year’s profit) may not be the smart thing to do in this stock. It is critical to figure out how the company will do going forward.

Venus Remedies – Company appears undervalued and has shown very high growth in the last few years. I would have to analyse if the growth is sustainable or not to make a decision.
Kamat Hotels – 2007 Debt equity ratio is 2:1, with the company carrying a debt of 270 Crs in 2007 (have not seen 2008 numbers). This debt is almost 10 times 2007 net profit numbers. This stock would fail to pass my fundamental filters and I generally end up passing on companies with this level of debt

ICSA (India) – This company like Punj lloyd and amaraja has shown phenomenal growth in the last 5 years. On a personal level such growth makes me nervous (although the market gets all excited by it). Before I touch this stock I would want to analyse the reason behind the growth and the sustainability of this growth. Basic numbers do not give the complete story. So I will need to research far more to make a decision on the company. A high growth in the last few years is good thing, but I would not extrapolate that growth blindly and buy the stock.

Axis Bank – Fundamentally a good bank. The P/B ratio is around 3 and the ROE has been dropping for the last few years. ROE is now at 12% which could be due to the additional capital raised by the bank. The bank is doing very well and growing rapidly too. I would personally track the stock, but the price is not cheap enough for me.

Yes Bank – This stock is current sweetheart of a lot of people. If I say something bad, some of you will beat me up 🙂 . The bank has good fundamentals. However at the current P/B of 4-5, the valuation is still too high for me.

From hardtoget

Alok – 2007 AR shows a debt of 3300 Crs (Debt equity ratio of 4). Unless 2008 is drastically different, this company is not for me. A debt equity ratio of more than 1 is generally a no go decision for me. I am not comfortable at all with such a high debt equity ratio, especially in cyclical industry

From vivek

Balmer Lawrie – I hold this stock. See analysis here

Berger Paints – I worked in asian paints and have seen how berger operates fairly closely. If there is one company other than asian paints which is aggressive and does a good job, it is berger. The company has a fantastic sales organisation. The fundamentals of the company are good and the valuation looks attractive too. If I was not as baised towards asian paints ( I hold this stock), I would invest in Berger paints.

Tata Tea – The company seems to have good fundamentals, good brands and decent valuation. I will be analysing the stock further.

Glaxo Consumer – I hold this stock. See analysis here

Castrol – The company has great brands, a good distribution network, very high ROE and great fundamentals. The valuation seems to be a bit on the higher side for me to pull the trigger. My key concerns are management quality and impact of oil pricing on the company’s profits. A few years back, I think the management tried to buy out the domestic shareholders at a low price. As a result I am not too comfortable with the management. In addition need to see if their margins will be impacted drastically by the oil price changes.

Hindustan Sanitaryware – Fundamentals look good, although the 2007 debt is a bit on the higher side. The valuations are quite attractive. I think the company is worth a closer look.

Subscription

Enter your email address if you would like to be notified when a new post is posted:

I agree to be emailed to confirm my subscription to this list

Recent Posts

Select category to filter posts

Archives