This is a commonly used, but rarely defined word. I am going to argue in this post that the sole purpose of investing is wealth creation.
Let’s take a numerical example. Let’s say you have 100 Rs. You can invest it in an FD at around 9-10%. At the end of 5 years, you will have around 161 Rs. We can call this the baseline level of return .
Have you created wealth in the above case ? I would say yes, as you have been able to increase your buying power over the investing period, but not by much (15% at best on average).
However the above example has a catch – I spoke about an average return of 15-17%. The reality is that the stock market returns are lumpy and you can have a period of 2003-08 of 30%+ returns and then a period of 2% returns for the next 6 years (2008-2013). So in this case, one is talking of wealth creation with an added level of risk.
The aspect of time
I arbitrarily considered a time period of 5 years in my example. What is the correct period? 1 month, 1 year or 20 years?
Let’s put the above two point together – One needs to make a level of post tax, post inflation returns over the investment horizon (10 years +) such that you can meet your personal goals. Why else would you put your money at risk?
It is fine to put your money in the stock market to feel macho about yourself – but let’s not call that investing. Bungee jumping off a cliff is also done for thrills, but no one calls its investing !
If you agree that the purpose of investing is wealth creation over a long period of time, it is important not only to earn high returns, but to also do it consistently over a period of time. There is no point earning 30%+ returns for four years and then losing 50% in the 5th(Which will translate into an 8% annual return)
Now If you shift your focus from high returns (to feel good or boast about it) to consistent returns (to create maximum wealth), the investing approach changes.
If you are looking for above average, but consistent returns for the long run what should one look for ? If you are looking at earning a 15-20% return over a 10-20 year period , I would suggest looking for companies which are earning this kind of return on capital now and have the capability to do so for a long period of time.
Let’s look at an example here – This is a current holding for me and not a stock tip. The name is Crisil.
Following is a table of price, and annual return/ CAGR for the last 10 years
As you can see, even if you purchased the company on 31stDecember each year (blindly without worry about valuation), you would have done well. This result boils down to the following reason
– The company has a wide and deep moat in the ratings industry due to government mandated entry barriers (none can just start a ratings agency), Buyer power (Companies have to pay to get their debt rated and the cost is usually a small percentage of the debt) and lack of substitutes (even banks insist on company ratings now based on RBI directive).
– The deep and wide moat has enabled the company to maintain a high return on capital of 50%+ for the last 10 years. The company has been able to re-invest a small portion of its profits to fund its growth and has returned the excess capital to shareholders via dividends and buybacks.
The catch
There always a catch in investing – nothing is as easy as it looks. For starters, this approach requires a huge dose of patience.
The other catch is that this approach is very boring. You find a few companies like crisil and then spend maybe 1 hr each quarter and a few hours every year end reviewing the progress. If the company is still performing as it always has, you have no further work left. If you are a professional investor, what are you going to do with the rest of your time ??
Returns over entertainment
Although this ‘rip van winkle’ approach makes a lot of sense, I am unlikely to follow it fully. I enjoy the process of investing, looking for new ideas and doing all kinds of experiments. At the same time, a major portion of my portfolio is slowly moving towards such long term ‘wealth creation’ ideas.
—————-
Stocks discussed in this post are for educational purpose only and not recommendations to buy or sell. Please contact a certified investment adviser for your investment decisions. Please read disclaimer towards the end of blog.
dear rohit,more stocks like crisil, and u can be in hawaii sun bathing, or in omaha enjoying steaks and cola, or in bahamas doing charityget us some of those in our model portfolio… we will all join u there at waikiki
Very very very true. The steady compunders are the best only if one could find them and have the patience to do nothing.
Hi dr madhuLOL …if only I was that patient, but over time that's the idea.also I will be bored out of my mind if I just sit on beach doing nothing :)rgdsrohit
hi luckyfinding steady compounders is not too tough. a handful are enough …problem is being patient with them when they don't perform for a year or two or even for 5 yearsrgdsrohit
Hi Rohit,Excellent post…..NTPC quoting 1 time book and even if you remove the incentive than too ROE comes to 13%…coal issue will be resolved…..the economics of power business(Looming power cuts in summer)will prevail over the politics………Long term risk are more envorinmental……..if carbon capture tech is enforced on thermal plants in india like it s done in US europe then cost s would go up…..for that to happen Madha Patkar has to become envoirment min(Near future not possible)…..If it slips below 85 then it is a good buy for patient investors.RegardsAnurag
Good one Rohit, wonder why the opposite sex finds it boring..:-)
Hi Rohit,Good post. Beating inflation is a basic requirement of building wealth. People often underestimate the impact of inflation. With great companies, usually the longer you can hold the shares, the better off you will be. As Warren Buffet has often said, his favourite holding period is “forever”. Of course, it is easier said than done. When you see a 2x, 3x, 4x gain in a few years, there is a strong urge to sell and book profits. The question to ask yourself at the time is: can you invest the gains in a better company? If not, just stay put.Sameer
Marico appears to be a candidate as it is being beaten down due to short term issues. What do you think of it in terms of business quality – good or bad?